question 1

Upcoming Ballot Questions and Our School System

Children Reading[Written Guest Blogger, Myriam Ortiz from BPON]

There has been much debate about how best to reform our state’s education system, but we all agree on the main goal: We want every child in the state to have the opportunity to learn in safe schools with well prepared teachers. Our shared belief in the value of a good education has produced an education system that is among the best in the country.

Of course there is much room for improvement. While we have made gains in closing the opportunity gap between students in low-income school districts and those in wealthy communities since the Education Reform Act was placed in 1993, we still face great challenges. Parent and student activists, teachers, administrators and elected officials in Boston are all engaged in efforts to improve the way we educate our children. Now is not the time to retreat.

This year voters are being asked to weigh in on a ballot question that could very well have a profound impact on school reform efforts. Ballot Question 3, which would cut the state’s sales tax by more than half, would remove $2.5 billion from the state’s budget. Opponents of the measure estimate it would cut $43 million in state education and local aid funding from Boston’s budget...

What Did We Vote For?

Voters [http://llnw.image.cbslocal.com]Lessons Learned from Question 1

One week ago, voters across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts voted overwhelmingly to preserve our schools and youth programs. They voted to safeguard our emergency and safety structures. They voted to protect our elderly parents and our sick neighbors.

Our neighbors voted against Question 1 - the repeal of our state income tax - in the face of a national economic downturn, while our country and state faced job losses, and amid a presidential campaign that witnessed both parties promising tax cuts to the middle class.

They voted 'no' because voters understand the direct connection between the health of our communities and the revenues that we use to support their public structures.

We all saw community activists working in a network across the state, having conversations with voters in neighborhood action groups, chambers of commerce, public and private employee unions, local town hall meetings, and nonprofit membership meetings. We began to learn what messages worked and what messages didn't work in different communities.

The ONE Massachusetts Network is about to begin a statewide debriefing project to learn more from our communities and organizational members:

Which public structures do you rely and place value on, and where do those structures need improvement?
What sort of changes need to be made to restore your faith that an increase in taxes would be spent wisely and collected fairly?

ONE Massachusetts' job is not to craft the content of a tax reform package, but to help our network of statewide and community-based organizations to develop a membership education program around tax and budget policy, and to empower them to participate in the upcoming public debate by declaring that their communities understand the need for additional revenues - as long as they are fairly collected and effectively used.

[Continued: Next Steps & Insider Budget Briefing Special Guests!]

Is Voters' Message on Importance of Taxes Being Ignored?

Q1 Results [From Boston.com]While Tuesday's media spotlight was clearly on the national stage, Massachusetts voters demonstrated extraordinary participation on issues hitting closer to home. Voters across the state demonstrated the importance of the income tax by overwhelmingly voting NO on Question 1, defeating this dangerous ballot question.

What do the people of Massachusetts need to do to demonstrate that they: are truly ready to fight for their communities, and understand the responsibilities of doing so?

Voting Results

The ballot question to eliminate our income tax was defeated in every town statewide, with 'No' percentages as high as 91.2% (Leverett, MA), and over half of the towns voting over 65% 'No.' 

70% of voters statewide voted No.

Syndicate content